Journal article
Rebirth of Socratic Origins of Philosophy in the Digital Era
Abstract
It has been proven that philosophical dialogues and debates using digital information dissemination tools now play a leading role in popularizing philosophy beyond the academic community. It has been established that the main differences between oral dialogue and printed interviews are the degree of text editing, the possibility of changing the positions of dialogue participants, the presence of speech intonational and emotional colouring, and stylistic communication limitations. The perceptual advantages of oral dialogue lie in its accessibility to a wide range of people, deeper immersion in the communicative situation, and a better understanding of the personal traits of the communication participants.
Cite
Dr. Nataliia Reva, Jack Symes, Nataliia Shcherbyna-Supruniuk, Vsevolod Khoma (2024). Rebirth of Socratic Origins of Philosophy in the Digital Era. Sententiae 43 (2): 106-119.
@article{reva2024rebirth,
author = {Nataliia Reva and Jack Symes and Nataliia Shcherbyna-Supruniuk and Vsevolod Khoma},
title = {Rebirth of Socratic Origins of Philosophy in the Digital Era},
journal = {Sententiae},
volume = {43},
number = {2},
pages = {106-119},
year = {2024},
doi = {10.31649/sent43.02.106},
}

